The page uses Browser Access Keys to help with keyboard navigation. Click to learn moreSkip to Navigation

Different browsers use different keystrokes to activate accesskey shortcuts. Please reference the following list to use access keys on your system.

Alt and the accesskey, for Internet Explorer on Windows
Shift and Alt and the accesskey, for Firefox on Windows
Shift and Esc and the accesskey, for Windows or Mac
Ctrl and the accesskey, for the following browsers on a Mac: Internet Explorer 5.2, Safari 1.2, Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape 6+.

We use the following access keys on our gateway

n Skip to Navigation
k Accesskeys description
h Help
    Drew University
   
 
  Sep 22, 2017
 
 
    
2016-2017 Theological School Catalog [ARCHIVED CATALOG]

Grievance Process


Introduction:

Drew Theological School has established the following grievance procedures to give the community a process with which to deal with matters perceived as unfair between individuals within the community. This policy is to be used in settling grievances involving faculty members, students, staff, and/or administrators who are part of the Theological School community. These procedures assume the principle that ways should be found to work out our differences fairly and amicably within our community and when possible without resorting to University procedures for dealing with professional misconduct or abuse of human rights. In no case do the procedures listed below preclude the possibility that the grievant will take more formal action through University channels. For further information on the University process, see the Drew Human Rights policy at https://www.drew.edu/humanrights/

Informal Procedure:

Individuals within the Theological School community who perceive that another member of the community has acted in an unfair way should request a meeting with that colleague in order to discuss the matter and express their concern. All members of the community are encouraged to attempt to resolve differences between themselves and others.

If the grievant has not reached a resolution through a direct conversation he/she may invite a third person into the conversation for an informal procedure of resolution. If a student or a staff person is involved, that person might be a dean. If both parties are faculty members the third party might be another faculty member–possibly someone from the Committee on Faculty. If either person is an administrator, the third person might be a faculty member or a dean. All parties to this conversation should agree to keep the conversation confidential. If either or both of the parties is not a native speaker of English, it may be helpful to have someone who speaks the native language present to help avoid miscommunication.

If a resolution cannot be achieved through this informal process, the grievant may decide not to proceed with the complaint or may begin the more formal grievance procedures below.

Formal procedures:

While this is called the formal procedures, it does not move the situation out of the Theological School community into University policy. All people participating in these procedures are required to keep the information presented and the content of the conversations confidential.

First, both parties are asked to put in writing their own interpretation of the grievance. After the Dean of the Theological School has read these reports, the dean will request the two parties to sit together with the dean and attempt reconciliation. The goal of this meeting is to try to find the truth within the remembrance and through this rehearing of the details help the individuals reach reconciliation. Written material will not be saved from this meeting.

If reconciliation is not reached, the next step will be to gather a group of peers to hear the individuals involved. Again, the goal will be to resolve the issue within the community. While the group will have no authority to penalize anyone it is hoped that the wisdom of the group will help all to reach reconciliation. The group might include five people with two chosen by each of the two individuals involved. The fifth person could be a dean or a member of the Committee on Faculty at the request of the grievant.

This process does not exclude the grievant from access to University procedures at any time along the process, or at this stage, when these steps have been completed without an acceptable resolution. Nor is this policy to be construed to inhibit or prevent the grievant from reconsidering an informal resolution with the individual at any time in the process.